欢迎来到课桌文档! | 帮助中心 课桌文档-建筑工程资料库
课桌文档
全部分类
  • 党建之窗>
  • 感悟体会>
  • 百家争鸣>
  • 教育整顿>
  • 文笔提升>
  • 热门分类>
  • 计划总结>
  • 致辞演讲>
  • 在线阅读>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 课桌文档 > 资源分类 > DOCX文档下载  

    牛津经济研究院-英国在线零售税的经济影响(英)-2021.11-46正式版.docx

    • 资源ID:1038739       资源大小:667.38KB        全文页数:47页
    • 资源格式: DOCX        下载积分:5金币
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    会员登录下载
    三方登录下载: 微信开放平台登录 QQ登录  
    下载资源需要5金币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)
    支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP免费专享
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    牛津经济研究院-英国在线零售税的经济影响(英)-2021.11-46正式版.docx

    OXFORDECONOMICSTHEECONOMICIMPACTOFANONLINERETAILSALESTAXINTHEUKANINDEPENDENTREPORTFORAMAZONUKNOVEMBER2020OXFORDECONOMICSABOUTOXFORDECONOMICSOxfordEconomicswasfoundedin1981asacommercialventurewithOxfordUniversity'sbusinesscollegetoprovideeconomicforecastingandmodellingtoUKcompaniesandfinancialinstitutionsexpandingabroad.Sincethen,wehavebecomeoneoftheworld,sforemostindependentglobaladvisoryfirms,providingreports,forecastsandanalyticaltoolsonmorethan200countries,250industrialsectors,and7,000citiesandregions.Ourbest-in-classglobaleconomicandindustrymodelsandanalyticaltoolsgiveusanunparalleledabilitytoforecastexternalmarkettrendsandassesstheireconomic,sialandbusinessimpact.HeadquarteredinOxford,England,withregionalcentresinNewYork,London,Frankfurt,andSingapore,OxfordEconomicshasofficesacrosstheglobeinBelfast,Boston,CapeTown,Chicago,Dubai,Dublin,HongKong,LosAngeles,Melbourne,MexicoCity1Milan,Paris,Philadelphia,Stockholm,Sydney,Tokyo,andToronto.Weemploy400full-timestaff,includingmorethan250professionaleconomists,industryexperts,andbusinesseditors-oneofthelargestteamsofmacroeconomistsandthoughtleadershipspecialists.Ourglobalteamishighlyskilledinafullrangeofresearchtechniquesandthoughtleadershipcapabilitiesfromeconometricmodelling,scenarioframing,andeconomicimpactanalysistomarketsurveys,casestudies,expertpanels,andwebanalytics.OxfordEconomicsisakeyadvisertocorporate,financialandgovernmentdecision-makersandthoughtleaders.Ourworldwideclientbasenowcomprisesover1,500internationalorganisations,includingleadingmultinationalcompaniesandfinancialinstitutions;keygovernmentbodiesandtradeassociations;andtopuniversities,consultancies,andthinktanks.NOVEMBER2020AlldatashownintablesandchartsareOxfordEconomics,owndata,exceptwhereotherwisestatedandcitedinfootnotes,andarecopyright©OxfordEconomicsLtd.ThisreportisconfidentialtoAmazonUKandmaynotbepublishedordistributedwithouttheirpriorwrittenpermission.Themodellingandresultspresentedherearebasedoninformationprovidedbythirdparties,uponwhichOxfordEconomicshasreliedinproducingitsreportandforecastsingoodfaith.AnysubsequentrevisionorupdateofthosedataW川affecttheassessmentsandprojectionsshown.Todiscussthereportfurtherpleasecontact:HenryWorthington:hworthinatonOxfordEconomics4Millbank,LondonSW1P3JA,UKTel:+442039108000人OXFORDTABLEOFCONTENTSExecutivesummary11. Introduction42. Howweassesstheimpactofanonlineretailsalestax52.1 Analyticalframework52.2 Policyassumptions62.3 Forecastconditionsin202263. Theeconomicimpactofanonlineretailsalestax93.1 Declineinonlinesales93.2 Lossinconsumerwelfareandsuppliers*margins93.3 "Revenue-equivalent"alternatives124. Distributionalandenvironmentalimpactsoftheonlineretailsalestax134.1 Consumerwelfareimpactbyhouseholdincomedeciles134.2 Impactontheelderlyandthedisabled154.3 Impactbysizeofbusiness164.4 Regionaldistributionofwelfareandmarginlosses174.5 Indicativeemploymentlosses194.6 Environmentalimpact215. Assessmentagainsttheprinciplesoftaxpolicy236. Conclusionsandkeyfindings25Appendix 1: Modellingapproachandmethodology27Appendix 2: Sensitivityanalysis37OXFORDECONOMICSEXECUTIVESUMMARYBACKGROUNDCONTEXTANDSTUDYMOTIVATIONOn27July2020,HMTreasury(HMT)announcedacallforevidencearoundtheissueofabusinessratesreview.1ContainedwithinthisdocumentwasaconsiderationofalternativetaxbasesthatcouldraiserevenuefortheExchequertocompensateforanyshortfallthatmightbecreatedbybusinessratesreform.Thetwooptionsspecifiedwereacapitalvaluestaxpayablebythepropertyownerandanonlinesalestax(OST).ThedocumentinvitedbusinessestorespondtotheprospectofanOST.Inthiscontext,AmazonhavecommissionedOxfordEconomicstoproduceanindependentquantitativeassessmentoftheeconomicimplicationsoftheintroductionofsuchataxintheUK.Beyondtheaggregateimplicationsforfirms,consumersandgovernmentrevenuewehavealsoassessedthepotentialenvironmental,distributional,andregionalconsequencesofanOST.ASSUMPTIONSThecallforevidencedocumentprovidednoguidanceonthestructureofanyOSTbeyondsayingitwouldbeleviedononlinesalestoUK-basedcustomersandfocusedon,salesindirectcompetitionwiththosecarriedoutthroughphysicalpremises,2ForthepurposeofthisstudywehavemadethefollowingassumptionswithregardtothescaleandscopeoftheOST. Thetaxwouldbeimposedataflatadvaloremrateof2%. Thetaxwouldapplytoallretailsales(excludingautomotiveandfuel)andtoaselectionofB2Cservices:foodtakeaway,travelandaccommodation.Thetaxisintroducedin2022duringwhichperiodsocialdistancingpoliciesnolongerapply.Themodellingresultspresentedherearenaturallydependentontheseassumptions.DetailedresultsfromsensitivityanalysisaroundtheseassumptionscanbefoundinAppendix2ofthisdocument.KEYTERMSUSEDINTHISREPORT Theeconomicanalysissetoutinthisreportmeasurestheimpactonconsumersintermsofwelfareloss.Forconsumers,welfarefrommakingapurchaseismeasuredasthedifferencebetweenthemaximumamounttheconsumeriswillingtopayforthegoodorserviceandthepricethatisactuallypaid.Theimpactononlinesalesplatforms,andupstreambusinesses(collectivelyreferredtoas'suppliers')ismeasuredintermsofareductionintheirmargin,whichforthepurposesofthisanalysis,isthepricereceivedforagoodorserviceandthecostofprovidingit.OXFORDECONOMICSDeadweightloss,ornetwelfareloss,isthedifferencebetweentheincreaseingovernmentrevenuesandthesumoftheadverseimpactonconsumersandsuppliers.Economicconsequencesofa2%OSTWefindthatthattheintroductionofanOSTwouldraisearound£1.6billioningovernmentrevenue.Theburdenofthetaxwouldbesplitbetweenconsumers,onlinesalesplatforms,andupstreambusinesses.Ouranalysisshowsthatamajorityofthetax,sburdenwillmostlikelybebornebyconsumerswhocouldlosearound£1.3billioninwelfareterms,whereassupplierscouldlosejustover£500million.£ millionsFig.1.Impactofintroducinga2%OSTin2022Netwelfareloss2,0001,800-1,600_1,400-1,200-1,000-800-600-400-200-0-Suppliers'marginreduction506Consumerwelfare loss1,270(deadweight loss) 206Government gain/deadweight lossWeIfareZmargin lossSource:OxfordEconomicsOverall,theincreaseingovernmentrevenuesisnotsufficienttocompensateforthecombinedlossinconsumerwelfareandsuppliers*margins.ThenetinefficienciesduetotheOSTareestimatedtobearound£200million(i.e.,13%oftherevenue).DistributionalandenvironmentaleffectsAnOSTwillhithouseholdsinthelowestincomedecilethehardest.OurindicativemodellingsuggeststhatthereisnoclearpatterntothedistributionalimplicationsofanOST.However,ouranalysisdidsuggestthathouseholdsinthebottomincomedecilewillsufferthelargestdropinwelfareperpoundofdiscretionaryincome.TheOSTwillalsohavearestrictiveimpactonelderlyanddisabledpeoplethatarebecomingincreasinglyreliantononlineshoppingtopurchaseessentials.Whiletheelderlytendedtoshoplessonlinein2019comparedtoyoungerpeople,therestrictionsrelatedtotheCovid-19pandemichavenudgedmanytoshopmoreonlineandhaveperhapsovercomesomeoftheinitial»OXFORDECONOMICSbarrierstoonlineshopping.Thedisabledhavealsobecomeincreasinglyreliantononlineshoppinginrecentyears:theshareofthosewithdisabilityshoppingonlinehasincreasedfrom56%in2015to73%in2019andhasjumpedupto81%in2020.TheOSTisalsolikelytodisproportionatelyaffecteconomicactivityinregionsoftheUKwithloweraverageincomes.ThenegativeeconomicimpactsofanOSTonconsumersandbusinessesW川befeltmostacutelyinNorthernIreland,Scotland,Wales,andtheNorthWestwithrelativelylesssevereimpactsinLondonandtheSouthWest.Intermsofjobs,anOSTislikelytohaveadisproportionateimpactonregionsintheMidlands,theNorthWest,andtheNorthEast,wheredeliveryandwarehousingjobsaccountforamuchhigherproportionofregionalemployment.Wealsofindthatthetaxmighthindersmallerbusinessesfromaccessingpotentialcustomersthroughonlinechannels,potentiallystiflingtheirgrowthandreducingcompetitioninthemarket.WhenassessingtheimpactofanOSTontheeconomy,itisalsoimportanttoacknowledgethefiscalenvironmentatthetimethisreporthasbeenwritten.TheUKgovernmenthastakensignificantmeasurestosupportbusinessesandtheiremployeesinrecentmonthsandwilllooktoraiserevenueinthefuture.Thegovernmentsfiscaloptionswillneedtobeassessedagainstarangeofeconomicaswellasproceduralcriteria.InourassessmentoftheOSTagainsttheTreasurySelectCommittee'sprinciplesoftaxation,wefoundthattheOSTisdistortiveandalsocouldpotentiallyrestrictSMEsfromcompetingintheretailmarket.Further,thedisproportionateimpactonhouseholdsinthelowestincomedecileandoneconomicallyweakerregionsoftheUKaswellastherestrictiveeffectontheelderlyandthedisabledraisequestionsaboutthefairnessoftheOST.1. INTRODUCTIONBACKGROUNDIntheUKbusinessratesisataxchargedonbusinessesbasedontherentalvalueoftheirpremises.Thesystemhascomeundersignificantscrutinyinrecentyearswithcriticssuggestingthatithascontributedtothedeclineof,high-street,retail.On27July2020,HMTreasury(HMT)announcedacallforevidencearoundtheissueofabusinessratesreview.3Alongsidethedetaileddiscussionofhowthesystemmightbereformed,thisdocumentalsoraisedoptionsfortaxesthegovernmentmightintroduceto,atleastpartially,recovertherevenueshortfallthatwouldbecreatedbytheenvisagedreforms.Thetwooptionsspecifiedwereacapitalvaluestaxpayablebythepropertyownerandanonlinesalestax(OST).TheHMTdocumentinvitedbusinessestorespondtotheprospectofanOSTaspartofaconsultation.STUDYOBJECTIVESAtthetimeofwriting,objectiveevidencerelatedtotheimplicationsofanOSTisscant.Moreover,thefactthatsuchataxhasnotbeenintroducedanywhereelseintheworldmeansthereisnorealavailableliteratureonwhichtodrawconclusionsaboutitslikelyconsequences.Inthiscontext,AmazoncommissionedOxfordEconomicstoproduceanindependentquantitativeassessmentoftheeconomicimplicationsoftheintroductionofsuchataxintheUK.Beyondtheaggregateimplicationsforfirms,consumersandgovernmentrevenue,wehavealsoassessedthepotentialenvironmental,distributional,andregionalconsequencesofanOST.Intheremainderofthisdocumentwedescribethefindingsfromthisresearchanddetailhowthesewereformed.2. HOWWEASSESSTHEIMPACTOFANONLINERETAILSALESTAXWemodeltheeconomicimpactoftheOSTbysimulatinghowsuppliersandconsumerswillreacttotheimpositionofthetax.Wedescribeourmethodologybrieflyinthischapter.AfulldescriptionofthemethodologyisprovidedinAppendix1.2.1ANALYTICALFRAMEWORKOurmodellingisbasedonanestedstructureasshowinFig.2below.WebeginbyestimatingtheextenttowhichtheOSTincreasesconsumerpricesintheonlinesegment(andconversely,howmuchoftheOSTisabsorbedbysuppliers).Wethenmodelhowconsumersswitchtoin-storepurchasesorswitchtobuyingdifferentproductsaltogether.Fig.2.NestedmodelstructureOnlineIn-storeConsumerswill be incentivised toswitch purchases of the equivalentproduct to in-store rather than onlineOnlineOnlineIn-storeIn-storeProduct XProduct YProduct ZThe changes in prices and purchasinghabits will change the relative price ofdifferent productsSavingConsumerspendingSource:OxfordEnomicsTherevenue,welfare,andmargincalculationsarebasedonthedemandsupplyframework.Theintroductionofataxintroducesa'wedge',i.e.,adifferencebetweenthemarketequilibriumpriceandthepricefacedbyconsumersontheonehandandthepricereceivedbybusinessesontheotherhand.Theextenttowhichthepriceincreasesforconsumers(andconversely,decreasesforbusinesses)isdeterminedbytheextentof'pass-through'.Theextentof'pass-through'woulddependonthenatureofcompetitionamongretailersandbusinessesandthebargainingpowerofconsumers.Inourmodelling,weassumearangeofpass-throughestimatesbasedoneconomictheoryandareviewofvariousrelevantacademicpapers.Tomodelconsumerbehaviourfollowingtheincreaseinprices,wecombineddataononlinepurchasesfromtheONSwithestimatesofelasticitiesfromarepresentativesurveyofUKHouseholds(forwithin-productin-storevsonlineswitchingbehaviour)andvariousacademicpapers(forinter-productswitchingbehaviour).Basedonourmodelling,wequantifiedtheimpactoftheOSTon:OXFORDFCONQMICSGovernmentrevenue;Consumerwelfare,measuredinmonetaryterms;andSuppliers'margins.2.2 POLICYASSUMPTIONSTheHMTcallforevidencedocumentdidnotprovideanyguidanceonthestructureofanyOSTbeyondsayingitwouldbeleviedononlinesalestoUKbasedcustomersandfocusedonusalesindirectcompetitionwiththosecarriedoutthroughphysicalpremises.4ForthepurposeofthisstudywehavemadethefollowingassumptionswithregardtothescaleandscopeoftheOST.Thetaxwouldbeimposedataflatadvaloremrateof2%.Thetaxwouldapplytoallretailsales(excludingautomotiveandfuel)andtoaselectionofB2Cservices:foodtakeaway,travel,andaccommodation.Thetaxisintroducedin2022duringwhichperiodsocialdistancingpoliciesnolongerapply.Themodellingresultspresentedinchapterthreearedependentontheseassumptions.DetailedresultsfromsensitivityanalysisaroundtheseassumptionscanbefoundinAppendix2ofthisdocument.2.3 FORECASTCONDITIONSIN2022EvenbeforetheonsetoftheCOVID-19pandemic,highstreetretailerswerestrugglingwithincreasingrents,growingbusinessratesbillsaswellastheincreasingpopularityofonlineshopping.Internetsalesshareoftheretailmarkethasbeensteadilytrendingupoverthelastfewyears.Thistrendhasdramaticallyacceleratedthisyear.Socialdistancingpoliciestocontainthepandemicledtoasharpincreaseinboththevalueofonlineretailsalesanditsmarketshare.AsshowninFig.3,weeklyinternetsalesintheUKwerecloseto£1.5billionatthebeginningof2020(20%ofallretailsales).Weeklyonlinesalesincreasedtoapeakof£2.5Nllion(30%ofallretailsales)inJune2020buthavesincedeclinedto£2.2billion(26%ofallretailsales)inSeptember2020consistentwiththere-openingofnon-essentialretail.There-introductionofanational'Iockdown'inNovembertogetherwithseasonalfactors,however,shouldseetheonlinesharereboundin2020Q4.Atthispoint,theextenttowhichthischangeinbehaviourbecomespermanentishighlyuncertain.OXFORDFCONQMICSFig.3.Onlineretailsales,2015-2020H1£mnperweek%share00%20152016201720182019202000%201520162017201820192020Internetsales(left-axis)Internetshareoftotal(right-axis)Source:ONSOurforecastsarebasedonONSdataontotal(onlineandin-store)retailsalesfor2018groupedintothe10theproductcategorieslistedinFig.4.Totalsaleshavebeenprojectedforwardsto2022usingin-houseconsumerspendingforecastsfortherelevantCOICOP(classificationofindividualconsumptionbypurpose)category.Toforecasttheonlineshareofretailtradeforeachproductcategory,weusedregressionanalysistoestablishthepre-COVID-19trend.Thiswasextrapolatedonto2022.Toaccountforthepotentialpermanenttrendaccelerationthatmighthavebeencausedbyashiftinconsumerpreferencesduringthepandemic,wehaveassumedthathalfoftheunexplainedincreaseintheinternetshareduring2020remainedpermanent.5Research by UBS in the UK found that 71% of respondents said they would shop online ,*as often or more after the Covid -19 situation improves". Based on other survey evidence, Bain estimates that between 35% and 45% of the recent increase in online sales will turn out to be permanentBasedonthisapproach,in2022,weexpecttotalonlinesalesacrosstheseproductcategorieswillbe£84billionequivalentto18%ofthetotalsales(i.e.onlineandin-store).Amongthesecategories,foodandalcoholandfurnitureandhouseholdappliancesarethehighestvalueonlinemarketswithapproxim

    注意事项

    本文(牛津经济研究院-英国在线零售税的经济影响(英)-2021.11-46正式版.docx)为本站会员(夺命阿水)主动上传,课桌文档仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知课桌文档(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

    温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载不扣分。




    备案号:宁ICP备20000045号-1

    经营许可证:宁B2-20210002

    宁公网安备 64010402000986号

    课桌文档
    收起
    展开