SARS crisis management and political accountability.docx

SARScrisismanagementandpoliticalaccountabilitySAKScrisismanagementandpoliticalaccountabilityFirst,thecrisisexposedtheshortcomingsofthesystemofgovernmentTheSAKScrisishasonceagainexposedtheshortcomingsofthegovernmentadministrativestructure,indicatingthecurrentsystemhasreachedapointwherereformmustbe!Drawbacksofthecurrentsystem,Iusefourlinessumitup:theauthorityofgovernmentintodepartments,departmentsofpowerandinterests,profit-orientedwaytoapproval,theprocessingmethodscomplicated.Inthissystem,asocialcrisis,whenthegovernmentfacedacertainextent,lostincertainsectors(suchasthehealthsector)isaneffectiveregulatorycapacity;whiIecertainsectorsofself-bigger,theywillexerciseofthepowerandself-interestintertwined;thevariousdepartmentsareaccustomedtothewayindealingwithlayersofapproval,alwayswaitingforthehighermeaning,theresponsibi1itieswhoisalsounclear;administrativeexaminationandapprovalofthecomplex,butalsoleadtoinefficientworkproperlyencounteredSARSsortofaspecialcrisis,morealackofadequatecapacitytohandle.Encounteredacrisis,immediatelyexposedthelackofeffectiveandtimelyrapidresponsemechanisms.AnotherdrawbackisthatChinassystemofgovernmentbecausethegovernmentsfunctionsisnotclearlydelineated,andmanyseriousmattersofthemanagementoffragmentation.Underthissystem,localgovernmentsarealsodifficulttoreconciIethevariousministries,therelationshipbetweenthemilitaryandpoliticalsystem.Thewholesystemfromthepointofview,intimesofcrisissomeofthemajorissuesofwhoisresponsible,whoisinchargeofthequestion,whodonotknow.Evenifthecentralgovernmentorderedthatallgovernmentdepartmentsatal1levelsofeffectivecoordinationisdifficult-weareal1one-thirdacreofland,eachtubeofthe.Interestsofthedesperatestruggle,theresponsibilitytopushhard.HasbeenpushedtothecentralUtteranc.